Another month, another long-distance train traversing central Europe at night. Its nearing the end of a sunny evening in summery Vienna. The night trains start to dominate the Departures screen at the Vienna Hauptbahnof. I am at Platform 8 for my night train to Rome. Its already an hour late without having even left, since we still wait for it to approach the platform to begin its journey. My destination is the city of Naples, a city exactly opposite in character to Vienna. Rome is my connecting stop, and I am afraid I might miss my connection to Naples because of this unforeseen and totally unexpected delay. Before today, its hard to remember a delay of more than 10 minutes on any Austrian train.
Although the train network in Austria, and generally across Europe remains excellent, the night train experience does not seem everyone’s cup of tea. Back home, night trains are completely par for the course, and nobody even raises a whimper about the difficulty/inability to sleep at night on a (sometimes ferociously) moving bed with open windows. Here people seem much more circumspect, evidenced by how sparsely-populated train bogeys have been on the night trains I have taken.
My wonderful luck continues, and when the train finally does come, it turns out I am alone in my 6-person compartment. Moreover, trains that take you across countries and borders while you’re sleeping does sound like a fascinating prospect. It’s a nice feeling to wake up to those familiar text messages on your phone about phone roaming charges and a different landscape outside the window.
Train travel remains expensive, despite the existence of discount cards for every member of the family. Or to put it another way, air travel is artificially cheap and simply out-competes train prices for the same route. It does not, however, reflect the true cost of flying, which is easily many times higher than the train for the same distance. This remains a glaring environmental cost that countries and its citizens bear, and private airline companies thrive at the cost of state-owned railways. For flights being so cheap, there remains hardly any incentive for the average consumer to choose the train. For some routes, flying is cheaper than the cost of average meal in a not-so-fancy restaurant. Alternatively, it might be cheaper to get to, and out from, the airport than the cost of the flight itself. Why does the impending climate emergency not translate into economy-wide actions? Travelling remains a privilege. For the people who can afford this privilege, surely taking the more eco-friendly option can be incentivised?